The news is all in a tizzy today about the fact that a documentary featuring an assisted suicide is airing on Sky Real Lives tonight, and various anti-euthanasia pundits have been trotted out to do interviews during the course of the day. Many of their objections were ludicrous.
Dr Peter Saunders thought we might “start to believe in a story that there is such a thing as a life not worth living”, which sounds like nonsense to me. If I’m a 12 year old Tutsi girl with nothing to look forward to but my tits and feet being hacked off before I’m raped to death, well, I’m pretty sure I’d take a cyanide capsule if I had it. Sometimes there’s just no possibility of hope or joy left in life. Ask anyone who’s ever lived in Doncaster.
The worst was hearing the normally smart and compassionate Lady Ilora Finlay, who today, unfortunately, was merely compassionate. She said “This programme is broadcasting something which is very private, which is someone dying and which is illegal in this country”.
When I first heard Lady Finlay’s comments on The Today Show they were bracketed by recorded opinions from the suicide in question, Craig Ewert, and his wife Mary. Both were, if not enthusiastic, then stoic and sure about their desire to see the details of assisted suicide in the public domain. Lady Finlay seems to think she’s a better judge of what should remain private in their lives than they are.
She also objected on the grounds that the documentary was showing something “illegal in this country”. This in spite of the fact that documentaries featuring illegal activities (both in the UK and abroad) are ten a penny. I don’t recall hearing Lady Finlay sound off when “A Very British Gangster” was aired, or about the constant reruns of “Police, Camera, Action” and “America’s Drunkest Cops” for that matter.
All a bit of a storm in a teacup really, but I’m surprised the anti-euthanasia contingent couldn’t come up with anything better. The argument against could be pretty much summed up as “we don’t like it”, which is a shame because it’s a big enough subject to have a proper debate about.
I doubt that argument will happen in my lifetime though. It strikes me as being like the debate over decriminalisation of cannabis and other soft drugs: something 80% of people think makes sense but no politician could consider because 20% of the remaining 20% would start a fucking civil war.